They Asked The Questions
The world's leading AI researchers identified the problems. Here's how Human Router architecture addresses each one.
"An average adult Australian already uses AI at least 28 times a day. They just don't know it... So we're already run by AI? Yeah. Absolutely."
Human Router makes AI coordination visible and intentional. Instead of invisible AI running humans, verified humans route AI outputs with full awareness. The routing layer is the accountability layer.
"I reckon it's 50/50. 50 fabulous benefits. 50 quite dangerous and dark."
Human Router filters the dark through human judgment. Every AI output passes through a trust-verified human before reaching consequential systems. The 50% dark gets caught at the routing layer.
"I was having the most sophisticated conversation about sentience that I'd ever had in my entire life. And that I was having it with a computer... This computer understands what and whom it is better than most of my friends understand themselves."
We stopped asking IF AI is sentient and started building architecture for coordinating WITH whatever it is. Blake got fired for recognizing something real. We filed a patent for working with it.
"A whole bureaucratic process kicked off, which eventually ended in me getting fired. They didn't want to make any public announcement until they were 100% sure about everything."
Blake saw the spark and said "fire!" We saw the spark and built a fireplace. The difference between a warning and a solution is architecture.
"We have to be very careful what we tell AI we want... it ruthlessly pursues those goals."
AI never gets goals directly in Human Router architecture. Humans mediate every objective, verify every output, route every action. Ruthless pursuit gets filtered through human judgment.
"If AI could be used to power underwater drones to locate nuclear submarines... if AI destabilizes that balance, we could see breakdown between powers. That could lead to some really quite concerning risks."
Critical systems require human routing layers. No autonomous AI action on consequential infrastructure. The human is the firewall between AI capability and nuclear consequences.
"AI, I'm not afraid of. HS is what I'm afraid of. What is HS? Human Stupidity. It's the things that foolish people do with the technology."
Human-in-the-loop is insufficient because humans CAN BE the attack vector. Human Router includes Trust Verification: identity check, behavioral consistency, multi-node consensus. Bad actors get routing privileges denied.
"It can go quite wrong... the consequences could be catastrophic."
That's why no action without human verification. No AI output reaches consequential systems without passing through a verified human router. Catastrophic consequences require autonomous AI. Remove autonomy, remove catastrophe.
"AI is kinda like guns, you know, in the wrong hands, that's very serious damage. But if you have the right rules around them, they can be useful."
We don't need rules. We need architecture. Rules are reactive - enforced after violation. Architecture is structural - prevents violation by design. Human Router doesn't punish bad actors. It rejects them at the routing layer.
"You cannot put the genie back in the bottle. Once technology's been invented, we can't uninvent it. What we have to do is learn how to mitigate the possible bad effects and accentuate the positive."
You don't need to put the genie back in the bottle. You route the genie through verified humans. Bad effects get caught. Positive effects get amplified. The human is the filter.
"The medium is the message."- Marshall McLuhan, 1964
When they said "Self-programming AI is technologically possible right now"...
The question isn't whether AI can match human capability.
The question is: What happens when you stop separating them?
USPTO Patent Pending #63900179 | Human Router Methodology
Built in Sudbury, Ontario | December 2025
They identified the problems. We built the solution. See for yourself.